[AusNOG] Cisco Switch recommendations for a small ISP
Christopher Pollock
chris at ionetworks.com.au
Thu Mar 29 11:49:44 EST 2012
+1 for this - a previous life involved a lot of hardcore Ethernet with
tags++ and some advanced requirements, and yeah, test test test test test.
Then test again. If you require advanced q-in-q functionality and want to
ACL or switch or replace etc etc based on them, you gotta test it at much
as you can. In some experiences with the gear I used, some configurations
only worked under certain circumstances. Not something you want to find
out when deploying a supposedly unrelated service.
--
Christopher Pollock,
io Networks Pty Ltd.
e. chris at ionetworks.com.au
p. 1300 1 2 4 8 16
d. 07 3188 7588
m. 0410 747 765
f. 07 3245 0843
skype: christopherpollock
twitter.com/chrisionetworks
http://www.ionetworks.com.au
In-house, Outsourced.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Adam Nock <Adam.Nock at amcom.com.au> wrote:
> Id be a tiny bit careful there.****
>
> ** **
>
> We’ve had equipment from a couple of vendors which should have been doing
> completely non-invasive switching, yet either would not transit or would
> remove the lower vlan tag’s off stacked frames.****
>
> ** **
>
> As always, Best to test J****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:
> ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *Lincoln Dale
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 28 March 2012 1:24 PM
> *To:* James Mcintosh
> *Cc:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Cisco Switch recommendations for a small ISP****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:11 PM, James Mcintosh <
> james.mcintosh at rocketmail.com> wrote:****
>
> Can anyone comment on their experience with either of these or differences
> they've found?****
>
>
> neither likely meets all your requirements around q-in-q, although thats a
> bit of a generic requirement, any L2 switch can transport Q-in-Q as they
> are just L2 frames. Ability to be intelligent about encap/decap/stacking is
> another.....
> ****
>
>
> cheers,
>
> lincoln.****
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20120329/0dbf0788/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list