[AusNOG] SecurITon / RackCentral DC - Updated OutageNotification

[Joshua D'Alton]

+1 to that, your signature is 15 lines long :)  I can certainly understand
the frustration when on a mobile device, is there something perhaps that
could be added to AusNOG software to remove them for those like you who
have little choice in the matter?

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Matt Whitlock <
Matt.Whitlock at pipenetworks.com> wrote:

> **
>
> The signature thing is interesting. We've just switched to a new system
> that appends it for us. So for NOG posts I now have no way to stop my full
> signature from being sent. Unless I use my personal email address.
>
> I need to discuss this with IT! :-)
>
> I agree with Jared though that shorter signatures are helpful, especially
> when reading on a mobile device.
>
>
> Matt Whitlock
> Operations Manager
> PIPE Networks Pty Limited - A TPG Telecom Limited Company (ASX: TPM)
> **
>
> Fibre Operations & Provisioning Group is Quality endorsed by the ISO
> 9001:2008 certification
>
>
>
> Phone: +61 7 3233 9826
>
> Mobile: +61 410 506 172
>
> Web: www.pipenetworks.com
>
>
>
> ****
> **
>
> Any information transmitted in this message and its attachments is
> intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The above
> email correspondence should be read in conjunction with our standard
> disclaimer/terms which can be found at
> www.pipenetworks.com/docs/disclaimer.htm
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>
> To: Sam Silvester <sam.silvester at gmail.com>
> Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
> Sent: Fri Jun 01 08:59:36 2012
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] SecurITon / RackCentral DC - Updated
> OutageNotification
>
> That's fine, but when it came in it had 50% signature for me on an
> iPhone so maybe if they do go out people can shorten the sigs? The
> notice looked more like a sales pitch than anything.... Hence my short
> 'rude' reply.
>
> I then had an email from someone explaining that there are rumors in
> the industry that their site would go dark :) so if that had been
> explained and a smaller signature I would have been ok.
>
> Sorry to upset anyone. It was not my intention.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jared
>
>
>
> On 01/06/2012, at 8:52 AM, Sam Silvester <sam.silvester at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:31 PM, McDonald Richards <macca at vocus.com.au>
> wrote:
> >> Well said. Some of the venomous posts  of late really detract from the
> >> community and create a much more intimidating environment. If you don't
> like
> >> a post, feel free to delete it instead of telling the rest of the list.
> We
> >> don't care.
> >>
> >
> > +1 to Macca. The real value in this list and the AusNOG community
> > (meetings, IRC, email list) is that people shouldn't be scared of
> > being flamed - polite, professional feedback or list rules reminders
> > can be unicast if somebody cares that much about a long signature or
> > the relevance.
> >
> > Likewise, I find this list to be relatively low volume, and the
> > quality of posts is generally excellent. I can deal with the odd
> > exception to that just fine.
> >
> > Sam
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20120601/b0bae436/attachment.html>