[AusNOG] Looking for someone who has experience with Nextgen VPLS
Mark Smith
nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
Tue Apr 5 20:43:26 EST 2011
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:27:11 +0800
"Greg M" <gregm at servu.net.au> wrote:
> Thanks again to the members of the Ausnog community the speed issue is now
> resolved! :-)
>
Want to summarise what happen between 19:39 and 19:57 tonight? Did you
get your Windows TCP windows issues sorted somehow?
>
>
> Thanks to everyone who replied,
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
> [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Greg M
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2011 6:09 PM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Looking for someone who has experience with Nextgen
> VPLS
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> On the TCP Window size of things. Is there a way for the border
> routers/switches on each end of the VPLS to be able to handle this so that
> manually setting TCP Window and TCP Window scaling on every single Windows
> Desktop PC/server isn't required?
>
>
>
> I just did some further tests, and from a Centos/Linux virtual machine in
> Sydney, I can get 100Mbps to the iiNet FTP, and to both Perth sites.
>
>
>
> --2011-04-05 20:03:02-- ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au/test500MB.dat
>
> => `test500MB.dat'
>
> Resolving ftp.iinet.net.au... 203.0.178.32
>
> Connecting to ftp.iinet.net.au|203.0.178.32|:21... connected.
>
> Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
>
> ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.
>
> ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.
>
> ==> SIZE test500MB.dat ... 500000000
>
> ==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR test500MB.dat ... done.
>
> Length: 500000000 (477M)
>
>
>
> 100%[=======================================================================
> ============================================================================
> ================================================>] 500,000,000 10.1M/s in
> 46s
>
>
>
> 2011-04-05 20:03:48 (10.3 MB/s) - `test500MB.dat' saved [500000000]
>
>
>
>
>
> From a Windows server on the same subnet/switch, I get 4.5MB/s.. So it seems
> like the link itself is fine, and it is indeed TCP Window related. Why this
> behaviour is so radically different between Windows and Linux is quite
> suprising.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
> [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Greg M
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2011 4:45 PM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Looking for someone who has experience with Nextgen
> VPLS
>
>
>
> Thanks for everyone's replies - I was able to do extensive troubleshooting
> today thanks to the excellent replies on and off-list, and it turns out that
> there may be multiple issues at play, including too many MAC's on the
> circuit, et al.
>
>
>
> It also seems that Telstra has not enabled 802.1q-in-q on their end so we
> are seeing a lot of encapsulation errors, and can only push traffic across
> VLAN1 from the Sydney side. They are now telling Nextgen that they cant
> enable Q-in-q, which could point to Nextgen provisioning the wrong type of
> Telstra service for us:
>
>
>
> The order from LOLO states "Telstra Wholesale Business Grade Ethernet
> Service N275XXXXX for Nextgen Networks"
>
>
>
> Is this a L3 only service?
>
>
>
> Since this morning, we have only been able to push 10Mbps through this VPLS
> circuit as well, so there definitely seems to be some faults on the
> Nextgen/Telstra side of the circuit, even though they claim everything is
> configured correctly.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
> [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Greg M
> Sent: Monday, 4 April 2011 7:07 PM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: [AusNOG] Looking for someone who has experience with Nextgen VPLS
>
>
>
> Hi Noggers,
>
>
>
> I am looking for someone who is able to consult/provide support to a large
> organisation which has recently deployed a 100M Nextgen VPLS link between an
> office in Perth & Sydney, and is experiencing the most bizzare throughput
> issues.
>
>
>
> This link has Nextgen fiber in Perth, with Telstra fiber hand off in Sydney,
> resold via Nextgen as an end-to-end VPLS circuit.
>
>
>
> The issue we face is relating to speed.
>
> - From Switch A In Sydney to Switch B in Perth, we can do a non-df
> ping of 1500 bytes for 24 hours without a single dropped packet - so there
> are no MTU issues. Latency is also always stable, even when maxing the link
> at 100Mbps.
>
> - Each server in Sydney connected to Switch A, can push the full
> VPLS line speed of 100Mbps to servers connected to Switch B in Perth (two
> endpoints of the VPLS tails)
>
> - There is a 3rd site in Perth that has a 1Gbps Amcom fiber link
> directly between Switch C in this site, and Switch B in the other Perth
> site.
>
> - Some systems on Switch A in Sydney, can push 100Mbps to some
> servers on Switch C in Perth site #2, yet others can only push 10Mbp, while
> some can only push 1-3Mbps. There are no speed issues between the two Perth
> sites, however as they can happily pump a full 1Gbps to each other.
>
> - There is a 100Mbps link to WAIX connecting into Switch B in
> Perth. Perth site #2 can do full 100mbps to a test FTP download (lets say
> iiNet's 500MB test file on their FTP), yet Sydney can only get 45Mbps.
>
>
>
> Basically only the directly connected Sydney Switch and Perth switch are
> able to max out the 100Mbps VPLS circuit. As soon as traffic goes beyond
> this switch, speed seems to degrade - however it doesn't degrade to all
> locations, as some systems/servers can obtain a full 100Mbps transfer speed
> both inbound and outbound via the Sydney to Perth VPLS. In Perth sites #1
> and #2, there are no speed issues at all, to any site (there are other
> remote VPLS and other connected endpoints), it is only this specific site
> that is having issues.
>
>
>
> There are no errors on any of the interfaces in any of the Perth sites,
> however the Sydney site reports a lot of Outbound Discards on the switch
> port that connects to the Telstra/nextgen VPLS link in Sydney.
>
>
>
> Happy to receive responses on or off-list, and we are happy to pay for
> someone either locally in Sydney or in Perth to help diagnose this - as a
> lot of money is being burnt on this circuit that is not providing consistent
> speeds. We have raised these issues to both Nextgen and Telstra and they are
> pointing the finger at our internal network.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Greg
>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list