[AusNOG] Outage that costs Millions
Karl Auer
kauer at biplane.com.au
Wed Jun 30 22:23:40 EST 2010
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 21:51 +1000, Lincoln Dale wrote:
> Algorhyme V2
>
> I hope that we shall one day see
> graph more lovely than a tree.
I know it's not about trees, nor is it so sweetly evocative and lyrical
as the two thus far presented, but in the spirit of the moment, and
continuing this collaborative attempt to get as far as humanly possible
from the topic in the subject line, here's a poem I wrote a few years
ago:
Packet
~~~~~~~~~
If the packet that's arriving at the designated port
Isn't buffered pretty smartly in the stack
You can only hope the protocol's got retries up its sleeve,
Or the packet's getting dropped, and that's a fact.
Does the IP in the packet match the interface IP?
Does the checksum in the header make good sense?
Do the half a hundred RFCs that probably apply
Unanimously speak in its defence?
If so then quickly, quickly, pass the packet up the stack,
There is application magic to be done!
But if not, then give the packet the swift and silent flick
And increment the error count by one.
Regards, K.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
GPG fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
Old fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100630/64f644eb/attachment.sig>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list