[AusNOG] What are we , collectively, doing about the impending mandatatory censorship scheme?

[Andrew Oskam]

I award mark with +100 interwebs. Great comment.

Sent from my iPhone
-------------
Andrew Oskam

On 08/07/2010, at 12:29 AM, Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego.net>  
wrote:

> http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/gillard-to-stick-with-web-filter-despite-disquiet-20100707-100qe.html
>
>
>
> You rock MMC.
>
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
>
>
> --
>
> Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
>
> eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
>
> skeeve at eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
>
> Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
>
> www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
>
> --
>
> NOC, NOC, who's there?
>
>
>
> From: Phillip Grasso [mailto:phillip.grasso at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 8 July 2010 12:26 AM
> To: Matthew Moyle-Croft
> Cc: Skeeve Stevens; ausnog at ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] What are we , collectively, doing about the  
> impending mandatatory censorship scheme?
>
>
>
> you raise good points, let me say this;
>
>
>
> Senate Seats. Hit them where it hurts.
>
>
>
> my back of envelope count is that we'll need 338K votes to get 1  
> senate seat.
>
>
>
> 1 Senate seat will probably be enough to do damage to a filtering  
> program, especially when they would want to do deals to get other  
> things across (assuming they don't have an overwhelming majority)
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Matthew Moyle-Croft <mmc at internode.com.au 
> > wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/2010, at 11:22 PM, Phillip Grasso wrote:
>
> > its been pretty clear what Google position all along. Why else do  
> you think Conroy has it in for Google.
> >
> > The problem is that not enough 'outcry' from the industry is  
> there, so Conroy is free to say he's got the support of the  
> industry, with a possibly few big players in his back pocket due to  
> NBN, he can say things such as 'industry consultation/support' etc.
>
> I think we could be super organised, with a huge media budget and  
> the Fed Govt wouldn't change their mind before the election.
>
> If they did change their mind then the opposition would just use it  
> to show (a) they're backing down and not delivering on YET another  
> policy (b) not tough on Child Pornography (c) not protecting our  
> kids.  Which ever of the arguments works the best for TonyA at the  
> time.
>
> This isn't a rational argument.  It's clear the Conroy isn't  
> interested in rational arguments.   The whole proposal is laughable  
> (heck, I've just come back from the US where we ARE a joke because  
> of this - most people think it's already running!), but still, the  
> telecommunications industry is a poor block of votes compared to  
> keeping the conservative Christian lobby on side (the people who  
> want this).
>
> The focus really needs to be on these things:
>
> If Labor is reelected will they claim they have a mandate to  
> implement the filter (even if no one voted Labor because of it).    
> Or will it die as a "non-core promise" if Conroy is moved on as  
> telecommunications minister?
>
> If the Liberals are elected instead, what will they do?   Will they  
> show sanity and kill it (small-l liberal) or be beholden to the same  
> conservative Christian lobby who have convinced Labor it's a good  
> idea.
>
> Labor, as above, can't be and won't be able to chance their minds  
> before the election.  The question is - will this be an election  
> issue or will we be back to beating up on the vunerable and non- 
> voting refugees again like the tough people we are.   (Must remind  
> Christians like TonyA about what Christianity is about - seem to  
> remember a few bits from the Bible from Sunday school and Jesus  
> embracing everyone and looking after the poor and destitute, not  
> just some of them - anyway, offtopic).
>
> MMC
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100708/880dc9f3/attachment.html>