[AusNOG] Less than 10% of IPv4 Addresses Remain Unallocated

[Dasmo]

I think you'll see nat before you see raised prices, and the problem with that is a lot of the end users won't know the difference. 

On 21/01/2010, at 11:50 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:

> 
> On 21/01/2010, at 11:07 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
>> What tends to get tractions with vendors, large and small, is purchase orders! The  problem is that for CPE its not the ISP that conventionally buys the CPE, its the end users who head to their local retail outlet online or in the store and buy the (cheapest) unit they can get their hands on, and, unfortunately, no IPv6 is included in their requirements in general. So unless the ISP wants to package up the CPE and include devices that fold in a good implementation of IPv6 (such as the rather cool FRITZ!Box from germany, and the extremely capable but somewhat pricey for the home consumer Cisco 877 offering), then nothing happens.
> 
> So how long until we see ISPs raising prices on access plans via an IPv4 address levy and offering discounted rates for users who can support IPv6? If it's a significant difference in their monthly access fee, it will put IPv6 on that end-users' requirements list when shopping for a CPE.
> 
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog