[AusNOG] [Fwd: [bogon-announce] IANA IPv4 allocations and bogonupdate 1/8 and 27/8]

[Karl Kloppenborg]

remember that saying "if it isn't broken don't fix it" (I think it was  
something along those lines)

Something tells me the people who manage Macdonalds wifi are in a  
predicament now... it works? but it is WORKING?



Cheers!
Karl Kloppenborg
Technical Director @ Karltec

P 02 8014 4253  EXT:104  | M 0438475892  |  www.karltec.net

Please consider the environment before printing this email. Think  
before you print.




On 20/01/2010, at 13:12, Mark Smith wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:09:04 +1100
> Karl Kloppenborg <karl at karltec.net> wrote:
>
>> Maccas in burwood and circular quay sydney ;)
>>
>
> Just another example of "just because it works, doesn't mean it's
> right".
>
>
>
>> Cheers!
>> Karl Kloppenborg
>> Technical Director @ Karltec
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> P 02 8014 4253  EXT:104  | M 0438475892  |  www.karltec.net
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email. Think
>> before you print.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/01/2010, at 12:55, Steve Lisson wrote:
>>
>>> I believe the free McDonalds wireless (at least at Brisbane Central)
>>> uses 1/8 :)
>>>
>>> (Let the jokes begin :)
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
>>> [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Shane Short
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 20 January 2010 11:43 AM
>>> To: Dobbins, Roland
>>> Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
>>> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] [Fwd: [bogon-announce] IANA IPv4 allocations  
>>> and
>>> bogonupdate 1/8 and 27/8]
>>>
>>> I agree..
>>> And even more so given the impending 'address crunch'-- you should
>>> never use address space that's not allocated to you *especially* if
>>> it's permanent..
>>>
>>> Anyone who does is asking for trouble and will be met with "hahah
>>> suckers" :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20/01/2010, at 9:06 AM, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins at arbor.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Jeremy Visser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From what I heard one, 1.0.0.0/8 is a de facto standard for
>>>>> transitioning routers between large companies in the context of
>>>>> joining networks after a merger, or other forms of inter-company
>>>>> peering.
>>>>
>>>> I've never hear of or run into this anywhere in the world, FWIW.
>>>> Unallocated netblocks should never be used for such purposes due to
>>>> the disruption caused when they're finally allocated, as is this
>>>> case in this instance.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com 
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>  Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.
>>>>
>>>>                      -- H.L. Mencken
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100120/c512cec7/attachment.html>