[AusNOG] Fwd: 2010 APNIC Fee Schedule - Call for comments

[Alan Lee]

I agree....

With regards to historical allocations... it almost feels as if us full paying members are paying the way for others.  It becomes even more annoying when someone on Whirlpool cannot understand why he or she can't route a /24 or higher on their DSL without going to a real business plan!

I am sure there are a ton of people who have legitimate reasons to have an historical allocation but I am sure there are even more who do not have a good reason to keep them and I am not saying take them from everyone... just fair is fair - how long have you had them for free?

(I don't pretend to know everything... and probably have a mistake up above somewhere with regards to historical allocations and how they work/are paid for or whatever)



________________________________
From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Noel Butler
Sent: Monday, 6 April 2009 12:43 PM
To: James Spenceley
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Fwd: 2010 APNIC Fee Schedule - Call for comments

New fees look fairer to me, always been an advocate of user pays, those with only /18 should never pay the same as those with 4 times that number of addresses, as i'm sure those paying for 131K ips would be annoyed at not paying less then someone with 500K ips.

I wear my flame suite all the time so bitch  away :->



On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:59, James Spenceley wrote:
All,

The APNIC EC has been evaluating member fee for the best part of 2 years now, this has culminated in a number of reports and models.

The final decision is yet to be made. The document below has been created in order to seek member's opinions and comments before the final decision.

http://www.apnic.net/ec/ec-fees-call-for-comments.pdf

Of any member economy this effects AU more than anyone else, so if you have a chance please take a look and address any comments to EC via the executive secretary exec-secretary at apnic.net<mailto:exec-secretary at apnic.net>.

Cheers,

--
James



Begin forwarded message:
From: Paul Wilson <dg at apnic.net<mailto:dg at apnic.net>>
Date: 2 April 2009 6:08:40 PM
To: James Spenceley <james at vocus.com.au<mailto:james at vocus.com.au>>
Subject: 2010 APNIC Fee Schedule - Call for comments
Reply-To: Paul Wilson <dg at apnic.net<mailto:dg at apnic.net>>

_______________________________________________________________________

Call for comments: 2010 APNIC Fee Schedule
_______________________________________________________________________


The APNIC Executive Council (EC) is in the process of completing its
work in setting a fee schedule for 2010. The EC has prepared a
"Proposed Fee Schedule" to take effect from 1 January 2010 and wishes,
at this stage, to obtain comments from Members. The "Proposed Fee
Schedule" is available at the following APNIC EC web page:

   http://www.apnic.net/ec

Please direct all comments to the EC via exec-secretary at apnic.net<mailto:exec-secretary at apnic.net> by 22
April 2009, 12:00 UTC+10.

As part of its formal responsibilities as defined by the APNIC By-laws,
the EC will review the Members' comments and make a final determination
on the 2010 Fee Schedule as soon as possible after the comment period.

   http://www.apnic.net/docs/corpdocs/Bylaws.htm


Regards,

Paul Wilson
Director General

_______________________________________________________________________

Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                     <dg at apnic.net<mailto:dg at apnic.net>>
http://www.apnic.net                           ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
_______________________________________________________________________



________________________________

_______________________________________________

AusNOG mailing list

AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net

http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20090406/67f8aecf/attachment.html>