[AusNOG] Do Optus layer 2 services - services support LACP?

Mark Smith markzzzsmith at gmail.com
Fri Nov 10 16:37:46 AEDT 2023


On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 15:14, Tony Miles <tmiles42 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Generically I would suggest that trying to run LACP over a carrier link is
> not the best idea. LACP is intended as link aggregation for the two devices
> that are directly connected together and so LACP packets are usually
> interpreted as "local" only. Most gear will give you the option to tunnel
> L2 control packets, but only on a P2P type service. Optus might work
> depending on product and configuration, I suspect nbn will never work.
>

Agree. More broadly it can end in tears if customers rely on and are
allowed to rely on undocumented service feature capabilities, because once
you allow a customer to try it and use an undocumented service capability,
and it works, and then they rely on it, and it can be hard or impossible to
take it away if you need to.

(It's a long story, however in the distant past I've had to work on taking
away customers' ability to run STP over their VPLSes, if they happened to
be, because we needed to use it internally to prevent forwarding loops
while LACP was negotiating on a specific vendor's equipment that had
followed the IEEE's specs to the letter (after that experience, you realise
most vendors aren't entirely implementing LAG/LACP fully IEEE compliantly).

Running STP/RSTP wasn't a supported service capability. It would work on a
VPLS that was only using our access circuits, however if the customer's
VPLS had at least one 3rd party access circuit, then we knew they weren't
running STP.

The lesson of the story is don't allow customers to actively "suck it and
see" for unsupported service capabilities. The technical product spec
provided to customers should be the only things that work, so you
definitely know what customers are and are not running over your service.)

Regards,
Mark.










>
> What are you trying to achieve and are there other options you should
> consider instead ?
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, 22:00 Max Soukhomlinov, <maxs at intellectit.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All, would anyone know if Optus’ SD Ethernet (and NBN EE as a layer2)
>> supports Layer 2 Control Protocol Transparency, specifically LACP?
>>
>>
>>
>> We’ve been trying to get an answer from the Optus account manager for
>> some time now without much success.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Max
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Intellect IT animated logo] *Max Soukhomlinov* | Director
>> 1300 799 165, 201  |  +61 411 596 249 <+61%20411%20596%20249>  |
>> maxs at intellectit.com.au
>> Suite 214, Level 2, 343 Little Collins St, Melbourne 3000
>> www.intellectit.com.au
>> Celebrating 20 Years of supporting Australian business.
>> Disclaimer: This message may contain information which is confidential or
>> privileged. If you are not the named addressee of this email, you must not
>> disclose, disseminate or copy this email (and any attachments). The
>> integrity and security of this email cannot be guaranteed as it may have
>> been corrupted, intercepted or altered in transmission, or contain viruses.
>> Liability is not accepted for loss or damage caused by any virus, errors or
>> omissions arising from transmission by the Internet. If this email has been
>> sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply email and destroy
>> the original
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20231110/6a94f191/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list