[AusNOG] AusNOG 2.0

[Noel Butler]

I might have trimmed too much of the already over quoting so my bad, I 
have zero interest in who was involved or what.

the "Fact" was it appeared Terry was claiming ausnog have zero liability 
in it, that is what i was referring to asking for the precedent case  :)

cheers

On 12/04/2022 13:13, Nathan Brookfield wrote:

> It may well be 'fact' and it's not my place at this stage to elaborate 
> to the remainder of the community but considering the 'Offender' and 
> the 'Victim' in this particular case were both at --

Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged 
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to 
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate 
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.   
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then 
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately. 
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost 
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20220412/be48e585/attachment.htm>