[AusNOG] "Simple Systems Have Less Downtime"

[Kai]

All said and done if an aircraft has sufficient failure which results 
with all engines being unserviceable the aircraft becomes a glider, and 
depending on individual perception it can be argued that glide 
configuration with engines in flame-out state may also be the most fuel 
efficient state for the aircraft.

On 5/3/20 11:07 am, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> There was a whole PhD paper demonstrating why planes with two engines 
> were safer than planes with four due to risk of catastrophic failure 
> having four engines/and complexity that outweighed the additional 
> redundancy it provided.
> 
> [b]
> 
> *From: *AusNOG <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net> on behalf of Mark Smith 
> <markzzzsmith at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 1:05 pm
> *To: *AusNOG Mailing List <ausnog at ausnog.net>
> *Subject: *[AusNOG] "Simple Systems Have Less Downtime"
> 
> This is excellent. About startups, however lots of parallels in network 
> and network protocol architecture and design.
> 
> Simple Systems Have Less Downtime
> 
> https://www.gkogan.co/blog/simple-systems/
> 
> Also cross over with RFC1925, "The Twelve Networking Truths", for those 
> that may not be aware if it.
> 
> 
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925
> 
> 
> 
> (RFC1925 might be the best RFC ever.)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>