[AusNOG] Latency NZ to Sydney

[Jonathan Brewer]

Hi Bradley,

*Wellington to AWS Sydney: 35 ms*

jonathanbrewer at nmm_wlg ~$ ping 54.206.0.89 -c 10
PING 54.206.0.89 (54.206.0.89) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=35.3 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=35.2 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=35.2 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=35.3 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=35.3 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=35.3 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=7 ttl=49 time=35.3 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=8 ttl=49 time=35.3 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=9 ttl=49 time=35.6 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=10 ttl=49 time=35.2 ms

*Auckland to AWS Sydney: 25 ms*

jonathanbrewer at nmm_akl ~$ ping 54.206.0.89 -c 10
PING 54.206.0.89 (54.206.0.89) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=25.1 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=25.1 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=24.9 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=24.9 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=24.8 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=25.2 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=24.9 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=24.4 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=24.8 ms
64 bytes from 54.206.0.89: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=25.3 ms

Cheers,

Jon

On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 18:45, Bradley Amm <brad at bradleyamm.com> wrote:

>
> Hey Guys
>
> Does anyone have any real word figures on what the latency from Wellington
> and Christchurch to Sydney would be.
>
> Auckland to Sydney appears to be about 25ms
> New Plymouth to Sydney appears about 40ms and New Plymouth to Perth on our
> IPWAN is around 80ms. I don’t have any services to test unfortunately from
> Christchurch and Wellington.
>
> Debating if I want to host some servers in Auckland or get a rack in S1 or
> S2 as it’s easier to manage, cheaper to procure hardware and cheaper for
> connectivity to our IPWAN.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20200107/727f6b0f/attachment.html>