[AusNOG] [Ap-ipv6tf] USG Call for Comment for IPv6-Only Deployment

[Jonathan Brewer]

The problem statement is that v4 adds "cost and complexity to network
infrastructure and raise significant technical and economic barriers to
innovation".

And the "only viable option to ensure future growth and innovation in
Internet technology and services" is a transition to v6 only.

Not sure I can support that argument. Maybe that innovation we're missing
out on is one of those "unknown unknowns".

-JB

On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 12:55, mike at thebibers.com <mbiber at ipv6forum.com.au>
wrote:

>
>> In light of Telstra's single stack deployment, this might be of interest.
>> Regards
>>
>> Michael Biber
>> 0412058808
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Latif LADID (IPv6-based New Internet) <latif at ladid.lu>
>>
>>
>> *USG Call for Comment for IPv6-Only Deployment*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Completing the Transition to IPv6 ONLY*
>>
>>
>> "https://www.cio.gov/assets/resources/internet-protocol-version6-draft.pdf"
>> <https://www.cio.gov/assets/resources/internet-protocol-version6-draft.pdf>
>>
>>
>
>> *Courtesy: Carol Bales, EOP/OMB; Ron Bewtra (JMD); Douglas Montgomery
>> (NIST)*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ap-ipv6tf mailing list
>> Ap-ipv6tf at lists.ap-ipv6tf.org
>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ap-ipv6tf
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20200402/c89e67f9/attachment.html>