[AusNOG] Software Defined Routers

[Robert Hudson]

Because the amount of CPU available on virtualised platforms is more than
sufficient for most people's needs? Because the numerous advantages of
virtualisation far outweigh the (perceived) performance penalties? Because
sometimes you don't actually have a choice?

Like any good tool, virtualisation isn't for every workload in every
environment - but where it does make sense, why not take advantage of the
benefits?

On Fri, 4 Oct. 2019, 7:20 pm Noel Butler, <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:

> if performance matters (and it does very much so), why would you be using
> *_anything_* virtualised at all...
>
>
> On 03/10/2019 23:19, Guy Ellis wrote:
>
> Has anyone bothered to evaluate TNSR which I will think replace pfsense
> where performance really matters?
>
> --
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Noel Butler
> This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
> information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
> protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or
> reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written authority
> to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> then delete all copies of this message including attachments, immediately.
> Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by
> reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only PDF
> <http://www.adobe.com/> and ODF
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument> documents accepted, please do
> not send proprietary formatted documents
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20191005/a9b450de/attachment.html>