[AusNOG] More legislative interventions

[Narelle Clark]

There are good third party clearing houses for some of this stuff. Whether
it's cost effective or appropriate for the average Australian ISP in this
context. We'll find out I suppose.

The Internet Watch Foundation is what we use for .org monitoring and
validation.

You really don't want your own staff assessing this stuff.


Narelle

On Tue, 9 Apr. 2019, 5:55 am Scott Weeks, <surfer at mauigateway.com> wrote:

>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> *474.32 Abhorrent violent conduct*
> (1) For the purposes of this Subdivision, a person
> engages in abhorrent violent conduct if the person:
> (a) engages in a terrorist act ; or
> (b) murders another person; or
> (c) attempts to murder another person; or
> (d) tortures another person; or
> (e) rapes another person ; or
> (f) kidnaps another person
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> You definitely like to lean towards a nanny state
> solution.  The obvious question is who gets to
> decide what is a terrorist act, or torture, or...
>
> scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20190409/8cdf17fe/attachment.html>