[AusNOG] More legislative interventions

[Serge Burjak]

Very scary section

(4) The eSafety Commissioner is not required to observe any requirements of
procedural fairness in relation to the issue of a 3 notice under subsection
(1).

On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 11:22, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins369 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/s1201_first-senate/toc_pdf/1908121.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf
>
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 10:57, Simon Sharwood <simon at jargonmaster.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So I was in a thing yesterday with a very senior government relations
>> person from one of the top 3 clouds. And they'd been advised the
>> legislation had very vague wording, meant that they and all cloud services
>> had potential liability.
>>
>> At least one other major cloud's lobbyists had the same advice. Both
>> tried to alert the government to the fact they'd cast the net far wider
>> than anticipated.
>>
>>
>> So some hurried back-channel efforts were made to change the wording of
>> the legislation to be more specific about social media.
>>
>> Those changes weren't made and this government relations pro was
>> flabbergasted at the haste and lack of consultation.
>>
>> He said it just makes it easier for people to fling FUD at the whole
>> local industry.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Narelle Clark <narellec at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Just to clarify - it was introduced to the Senate and approved last
>>> night. It will hit the House of Reps today.
>>>
>>> And the PJCIS hasn't even seen it.
>>>
>>> This is flawed in so many ways, and it will affect our industry
>>> massively.
>>>
>>> Why should anyone build a content related business here? How do we
>>> protect staff and customers from malicious posting in order to invoke this
>>> legislation?
>>>
>>> Narelle
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Apr. 2019, 10:43 am Narelle Clark, <narellec at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Parliament has just rushed through more impractical legislation to jail
>>>> executives of content providers (that would be all of us) if vile content
>>>> is not removed "expeditiously".
>>>>
>>>> Here is some reaction to it...
>>>>
>>>> Overview:
>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2019-04-04/facebook-youtube-social-media-laws-rushed-and-flawed-critics-say/10965812
>>>>
>>>> Law Council:
>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/am/start-ups-concerned-about-new-social-media-laws/10969282
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Scott Farquar:
>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/rushed-social-media-legislation-is-seriously-flawed/10969482
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Narelle
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Simon Sharwood | JargonMaster Corporate Communications |
>> M +61 (0)414 37 37 26 |
>> E simon at jargonmaster.com | W www.jargonmaster.com
>> 24 North Street Marrickville NSW 2204 AUSTRALIA
>> ABN: 14743763968
>> Work blog: jargonmaster.wordpress.com
>> Free/Busy details: http://www.jargonmaster.com/calendar/
>> I'm a member of  DHBC.org.au and a vExpert
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20190404/de8f0f26/attachment.html>