[AusNOG] Assistance and Access Bill moves to PJCIS
Michelle Sullivan
michelle at sorbs.net
Tue Nov 27 09:52:21 EST 2018
Paul Wilkins wrote:
> If Dutton is in fact ineligible to sit, then so too is his motion to
> introduce the Bill to Parliament. Or such is the stuff of dreams?
You are correct, if he is ineligible .. and *if he was at the time of
the introduction* then it should be challenged as not validly
introduced.. this will not be automatic though.
Michelle
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:39, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins369 at gmail.com
> <mailto:paulwilkins369 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Seems Dutton is about to get a lesson in constitutional law:
>
> S44 (iv) holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any
> pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the
> revenues of the Commonwealth; or
>
> shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a
> member of the House of Representatives.
>
> Kind regards
>
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 10:34, Paul Wilkins
> <paulwilkins369 at gmail.com <mailto:paulwilkins369 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> After the Department Home Affairs sitting on this Bill for
> over a year and conducting industry consultation they claim is
> confidential (ie: they have no one who'll go on record
> supporting the Bill) suddenly it's a priority, and the
> Minister for Home Affairs writes a wheedling letter to PJCIS
> to pass the Bill before Christmas.
>
> The lack of public and industry consultation, the vague and
> poor drafting, and then a sudden push to pass the Bill in a
> couple of weeks, rather suggest a deliberate strategy to pass
> a Bill that's out of all proportion to the need to combat
> terrorism and serious crime in the context of rising use of
> encryption.
>
> Rising use of encryption is hardly news to anyone. After all,
> a rising tide lifts all boats.
>
>
> https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=a46f0ed4-fc0d-4e95-bbd3-ef8fafe419ab&subId=663130
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 13:56, Paul Wilkins
> <paulwilkins369 at gmail.com <mailto:paulwilkins369 at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> /"In practice, if they balls-up the change request given
> to the device manufacturer or app/website developer,
> anything could happen."/
>
> Then you recall the obligation under the
> Telecommunications Act 1997 for carriers to "do their best
> to protect networks and facilities". No such obligation
> attaches to the Crown under the powers of the Assistance
> and Access Bill 2018.
>
> So, even if in the cases of misfeasance, non feasance, or
> malfeasance on the part of the Crown or its agents in the
> implementation of TCNs/TANs/TARs, and their impact on
> carriers businesses, liability rests, not with the Crown
> as you might ingenuously assume, but with the carrier who
> unwittingly acted as directed.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 06:38, Scott Weeks
> <surfer at mauigateway.com <mailto:surfer at mauigateway.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> -----------------------
> ...the drafting certainly seems loose enough for a future
> government to establishthe machinery of a police state.
> -----------------------
>
> I'm seeing this in *NOG lists and elsewhere all over the
> world. It's going to be an interesting next buncha years!
>
> scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list