[AusNOG] Industry code for dslam coexistence

[David Hughes]

Hah, thanks, I should have googled myself :)

So, based on that the Act has been amended to loosely provide protection against interference from different technologies, and Comms Alliance WC58 was working to revise documents to provide more specifics.  So I wonder if WC58 came up with the goods? There’s no details of output from the WC on the web site.

@Paul Brooks - are you still across this mate?  Any chance of an update?



Thanks

David
...


On 18 Apr 2018, at 1:41 pm, Jason Leschnik <jason at leschnik.me<mailto:jason at leschnik.me>> wrote:

Is this it?

http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2016-February/034323.html

Using this search in Google `Alliance dslam site:http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/`<http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/%60>

HTH

On 18 April 2018 at 12:57, David Hughes <david at hughes.com.au<mailto:david at hughes.com.au>> wrote:
Afternoon all,

I recall a while back there being a mention of someone looking at putting together requirements for the happy coexistence of multiple dslams on the same cable plant.  The context was for a FTTB provider delivering services in a building that has an NBN FTTB dslam in place.  Issues such as interference from multiple vdsl vectoring config etc.

I can’t recall where I heard of it or who was working on it, Comms Alliance possibly.  Sorry for being so vague, but if you are less vague about this can you let me know the details?


Thanks

David
...
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20180418/93b57bb4/attachment.html>