[AusNOG] High availability options for terminating point-to-point Ethernet (on Cisco CE)

[Matt Selbst]

Yup in a PPPoE scenario but I'm talking about P2P ethernet termination.


On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Nathan Brookfield <
Nathan.Brookfield at simtronic.com.au> wrote:

> VRF's with BGP running lower timers and you'll never look back, very
> reliable, fairly easy to implement even with your primary connection on
> PPPoE and the other on a routed VLAN.
>
>
> Worse case you can just have your LNS act as a BRAS and still use PPPoE on
> your Layer 2 services.
>
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Nathan Brookfield (VK2NAB)
>
>
>
> Chief Executive Officer
>
> Simtronic Technologies Pty Ltd
>
>
>
> *Local:* (02) 4749 4949 *|* *Fax:* (02) 4749 4950 *|* *Direct:* (02) 4749
> 4951
>
> *Web*: http://www.simtronic.com.au *|* *E-mail*: nathan.
> brookfield at simtronic.com.au
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* AusNOG <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net> on behalf of Matt Selbst
> <matt.j.selbst at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 25 May 2017 8:35 PM
> *To:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> *Subject:* [AusNOG] High availability options for terminating
> point-to-point Ethernet (on Cisco CE)
>
> Hi,
>
> Hoping for some advice. What is everyone doing for
> terminating point-to-point Ethernet services like AAPT's e-Line in a high
> availability environment? Cisco environment.
>
> With PPPoE, high availability was much easier as you could just have
> multiple LNS's and failover easily when the client would re-auth. With
> terminating a VLAN handoff on a /30 or /31 it makes HA much harder. If the
> customer edge router dies, failover seems pretty hard. VRRP doesn't seem to
> be an option especially with hundreds of customer sub-interfaces.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> -Matt
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20170525/70967816/attachment.html>