[AusNOG] Aus Industry Congratulations Email re: Brandis

[Rod]

Re: Brandis and his diary - the irony.

 

According to a news report today the request to see Brandis’ diary was likened to a metadata request.

 

He refused the request citing confidentiality – he’d have to get approval of everyone who appears in his diary. Tribunal ruled against him, now he’s thinking if appealing the decision – using taxpayer funds.

 

The request was for a printout of the weekly view of his Outlook calendar only showing dates/times and person of who he met with. It would not show any content.

 

*sighes.  One rule for the plebeians, a different rule for the people taking public money.

 

Rod 

 

From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Mark Newton
Sent: Tuesday, 6 September 2016 4:25 PM
To: Laurens Lafebre <laurens at lafebre.me>
Cc: <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net> <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>; Paul Brooks <pbrooks-ausnog at layer10.com.au>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Aus Industry Congratulations Email

 

On Sep 6, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Laurens Lafebre <laurens at lafebre.me <mailto:laurens at lafebre.me> > wrote:

Are trying to protect someone?

 

You’re joking?

 





Does anyone know if the DRIP applications would be covered under Freedom of Information requests?

 

Suck it and see.

 

http://righttoknow.org.au 

 

Brandis has just lost an FOI case this morning, so one can assume his staff have been adequately schooled in how it’s supposed to work, eh?

 

  - mark

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160906/8f70e49e/attachment.html>