[AusNOG] Consultation on s313(3) use

[Paul Wilkins]

Mark,
I'm glad you raised the point, as it needs to be clarified that the purview
of the s313 inquiry is "disruption" of services. It's not required to read
the data stream. For the purposes of s313 it should be sufficient to read
the SSL certificate, and then block by either white list or black list.

John,
For better or worse, we're heading to a future where SSL will not be
banned, but it will be licensed. This in my view is what's driving the
ongoing spat between the FBI and Apple.

Kind regards

Paul Wilkins

On 2 May 2016 at 13:49, Mark Newton <newton at atdot.dotat.org> wrote:

> On May 2, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John Lindsay <johnslindsay at mac.com> wrote:
>
> > This is easy. Just ban ssl. Sorted.
>
> Sure, they can do that, and we’ll all keep using it. Maybe we’ll rename it
> “TLS” so we don’t have to tell them that their ban has been unsuccessful.
>
>   - mark
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160502/e3894fef/attachment.html>