[AusNOG] Cost effective 10G full feed BGP router for IPv4 & IPv6

[Nick Evendor]

Waiting for RouterOS v7 working with 72 cores is like waiting to see who will be the next American President.

________________________________
From: AusNOG <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net> on behalf of John Gavrilita <jgavrilita at thesummitgroup.com.au>
Sent: Friday, 5 August 2016 2:17 AM
To: Alex Samad
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Cost effective 10G full feed BGP router for IPv4 & IPv6

RouterOS v7, in my eyes, is a unicorn for like half a year now... Jokes aside, this is what happens when you're making more than one change at a time in a system, as they're migrating to a new architecture, a new kernel, new daemons, rewriting much of the code base. It's a move they must take, otherwise it's a 72-core beast which cannot handle the throughput scale. It's like having the passengers on a plane with no engines to do the pedalling and spin-up the props in a futile attempt to take off ;)


John Gavrilita   |      Senior Network Engineer  |      The Summit Group

jgavrilita at thesummitgroup.com.au<mailto:jgavrilita at thesummitgroup.com.au>
thesummitgroup.com.au<http://thesummitgroup.com.au>
1300 049 749<tel:1300%20049%20749>

Level 1, 39 Railway Road, Blackburn VIC 3130<https://www.google.com.au/maps/place/The+Summit+Group+(Australia)+Pty+Ltd/@-37.8195827,145.1485403,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m7!1m4!3m3!1s0x6ad638b2d1d03e19:0xfb75608e0ae9e67e!2sThe+Summit+Group+(Australia)+Pty+Ltd!3b1!3m1!1s0x6ad638b2d1d03e19:0xfb75608e0ae9e67e>

[cid:image913000.png at 06DBB95A.31985447]
[cid:image658001.png at 724F61B6.EA01F747]
[The Summit Group]<http://thesummitgroup.com.au>        [cid:image940003.png at CF53D572.AA1B2846]


On 5 Aug 2016, at 11:13 AM, Alex Samad <alex at samad.com.au<mailto:alex at samad.com.au>> wrote:


On 5 August 2016 at 10:19, John Gavrilita <jgavrilita at thesummitgroup.com.au<mailto:jgavrilita at thesummitgroup.com.au>> wrote:
If you're ok with single-threaded BGP process on the RouterOS (I'm not), then 2xCCR1072, in 1U rack space, back to back, and two or three bonded 10G ethernets between them would perhaps satisfy your requirements?

One thing I have found with the smaller 1036 cousin is that it will only route single tcp streams at 1Gb/s  if you want to route faster than that, then the mikrotek are not the solution,


It can handle multiple 1Gb/s tcp streams, I have consistanly gotten up to 9.8Gb/s ..

They advise from mikrotek is V7 will fix the issue. something about pegging a tcp stream to a single cpu and that being limited to 1G..



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160805/45c5db0c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image913000.png
Type: image/png
Size: 984 bytes
Desc: image913000.png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160805/45c5db0c/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image658001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10728 bytes
Desc: image658001.png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160805/45c5db0c/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image716002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1930 bytes
Desc: image716002.png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160805/45c5db0c/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image940003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3004 bytes
Desc: image940003.png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160805/45c5db0c/attachment-0003.png>