[AusNOG] New NGFW recommendations

[Matt Smee]

+1 for palo alto firewalls, incredible stuff.


From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of James Hodgkinson
Sent: Friday, 5 August 2016 10:52 AM
To: Randall Bradford <Randall.Bradford at maxsolutions.com.au>
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] New NGFW recommendations

I've used ASA-X, Checkpoint and Palo in anger, give me a Palo anyday (and pay for Panorama if you have more than one cluster)

James


On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, at 10:46, Robert Hudson wrote:
I'd be immediately concerned with using the same vendor at multiple levels in your security stack.  Defence in depth should apply here - a different vendor/product at each layer.

My current employer is a Check Point customer, but I also find the Palo Alto story quite interesting, particularly in the NGFW space.

On 5 August 2016 at 10:29, Randall Bradford <Randall.Bradford at maxsolutions.com.au<mailto:Randall.Bradford at maxsolutions.com.au>> wrote:

We are replacing our older ASA5520 Firewall.  We currently use Sophos for end point protection.  Has anyone have any pros/cons using Sophos XG?




Randall




_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20160805/66edaaa3/attachment.html>