[AusNOG] Practical definition of "low impact"

[Stephen Carter]

Guess, it depends if you want to enforce carrier "Powers" or enter commercial terms. Commercial agreements have preference and we used to prefer amical commercial terms than enforce rights.

I guess it all depends on what exact problem you are looking to solve?


Stephen Carter
Working Technology

-----Original Message-----
From: David Hughes [mailto:david at hughes.com.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, 12 April 2016 9:52 AM
To: Stephen Carter <Stephen.Carter at workingtech.com>
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net (AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net) <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Practical definition of "low impact"


Hi

I've read through that previously and unless I'm misreading it there's basically no mention of co-location of any gear other than that required to terminate the incoming circuit.     "Parts 1, 5, 6 or item 3 from Part 4" relates to radio kit and termination of fibre (and unrelated stuff like pay phones).   From my interpretation (which clearly is lacking) there's no mention of any other gear that may be required to provision the end customer service.

I'm clearly missing something here.


Thanks

David
...


On 12/04/2016, at 9:43 AM, Stephen Carter <Stephen.Carter at workingtech.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> This is pretty specific
> 
> https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2012C00177
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Stephen Carter
> Working Technology
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of 
> James McMillan
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 April 2016 9:33 AM
> To: Joseph Goldman <joe at apcs.com.au>; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Practical definition of "low impact"
> 
> Depends on if it's a government agency serving the notice.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of 
> Joseph Goldman
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 April 2016 9:27 AM
> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Practical definition of "low impact"
> 
> "Multi-rack server room with redundant power, cooling and fire suppression, roof mounted genset and limited keycard+biometric access with security patrolling 24h"
> 
> Surely we could get away with that! :D
> 
> On 12/04/16 09:20, David Hughes wrote:
>> Morning all,
>> 
>> The telco act is a bit fuzzy on the definition of a low-impact 
>> facility so I'd appreciate a definition from real-world experience.
>> Is a low-impact installation limited to something like :-
>> 
>> 1. A small antennae on roof space of a highrise building.
>> 2. An antennae plus associated riser cabling 3. An antennae plus 
>> associated riser cabling plus kit in basement 4. An antennae plus 
>> associated riser cabling plus kit in basement and kit on each floor
>> 
>> At what stage above does the definition of "low impact" max out and the building owner has the right to say no?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> David
>> ...
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog