[AusNOG] (no subject)

[Paul Brooks]

If I use hungry eagles instead, will I be:
(a) non-compliant with the RFC
(b) offering a lower-latency service
(c) subject to ACCC investigation when other's links mysteriously fail
(d) all of the above


On 3/09/2015 4:32 PM, Jim Woodward wrote:
> It's all good in theory until your network delivery team calls in with bird flu :)
>
> On 3/09/2015 3:20 PM, Purdon, Bob wrote:
>> > So I reckon you'd be on solid ground if you used RFC1149.
>>
>> I recall that PIPE Networks did a trial of RFC1149 some time ago from the 127 Creek
>> St office.  Wasn't terribly successful :-)
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhjn8kbFe74
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150903/8ec201f6/attachment.html>