[AusNOG] (no subject)

[Phillip Grasso]

But its a "Carriers" service. surely needs metadata retention.

On 3 September 2015 at 11:26, David Tebbutt <
DTebbutt at sunshadeseyewear.com.au> wrote:

> >in the legislation is that it carries communications by means of
> electromagnetic energy.
> Does that mean if I put a bunch of tapes in the boot of a Tesla and drive
> them across town I need a carrier licence?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Mark
> Newton
> Sent: Thursday, 3 September 2015 11:14 AM
> To: Phillip Grasso
> Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net; James Cunningham
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] (no subject)
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:32:56AM +1000, Phillip Grasso wrote:
>
>  > maybe they could use of rfc1149.txt
>  > <https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt> based
>  > service, i'm not sure if they need a carrier license, given regulation
>  > probably,
>
> They wouldn't - Operating a Line Link requires a carrier service,
> but one of the qualifying characteristics of a Line Link as defined
> in the legislation is that it carries communications by means of
> electromagnetic energy.  So I reckon you'd be on solid ground if
> you used RFC1149.
>
>  > They may need roof permission or an open window. Not sure about
>  > the liability perspective, but i'm assuming a increase in dry cleaning
> bill
>  > for those traveling between from "overhead loss" or "drops"
>
> You'd also be able to avoid Dial-Before-You-Dig, but you'd have to
> come to some kind of Dial-Before-You-Shoot arrangement.
>
>   - mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150903/88bc1a66/attachment.html>