[AusNOG] AUSNOG in the news

[Jacob Gardiner]

You could still gain access to the archives, but only under the conditions of your subscription, conditions which reflect the openness of the list, without the risk of being quoted by the media.

There’s no reason why a journalist couldn’t still subscribe to the list, however they wouldn’t be able to use the content of the list without approval from the mods, and the author of the email.


-- 
Jacob Gardiner
@jacobgardiner

On 1 October 2015 at 9:27:56 am, Chris Gibbs (chris.t.gibbs at gmail.com) wrote:

I find the information in the archives a great reference when I start researching a new topic. 

Most of the information isn't controversial and I would hate to see nog closed to a private membership model.

As mentioned there is already a charter that is enforced. People always have the option to not reply-all and state their 'private' correspondence off-list.

On 1 October 2015 at 09:23, Jacob Gardiner <jacob at jacobgardiner.com> wrote:
On 30 September 2015 at 5:52:26 pm, Mark Smith (markzzzsmith at gmail.com) wrote:
With >2000 subscribers, hiding the archive isn't going to really be all that effective at preventing posts from leaking.
Agreed, however you can have a list charter/rules/terms and conditions which your subscription is subject to. You can’t do effectively the same a public facing archive.


_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog


_______________________________________________  
AusNOG mailing list  
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net  
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151001/1604b0e7/attachment.html>