[AusNOG] AUSNOG in the news

[Chris Gibbs]

I find the information in the archives a great reference when I start
researching a new topic.

Most of the information isn't controversial and I would hate to see nog
closed to a private membership model.

As mentioned there is already a charter that is enforced. People always
have the option to not reply-all and state their 'private' correspondence
off-list.

On 1 October 2015 at 09:23, Jacob Gardiner <jacob at jacobgardiner.com> wrote:

> On 30 September 2015 at 5:52:26 pm, Mark Smith (markzzzsmith at gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> With >2000 subscribers, hiding the archive isn't going to really be all
> that effective at preventing posts from leaking.
>
> Agreed, however you can have a list charter/rules/terms and conditions
> which your subscription is subject to. You can’t do effectively the same a
> public facing archive.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151001/6563afda/attachment.html>