[AusNOG] MS Azure connectivity

[Scott Weeks]

>> On 17/11/2015, at 1:33 PM, matthanna at adam.com.au wrote:

>> A colleague of mine is in the midst  of setting up connectivity with MS Azure. They've requested we use an IPv4 unique global addressable network range that is not globally routable or reachable from the general internet. To me this feels wasteful and unrealistic especially with today's V4 shortages. 
>> 
>> I'd like to find out what other people have done on or off list (off-list preferable). Also, if anyone from Microsoft can reply off-list and direct that would be great. 
--------------------------------------------------


--- bill at wjw.nz wrote:
From: Bill Walker <bill at wjw.nz>

If anyone else wants to know more about this, this page is a good starting point 

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/expressroute-routing/

The communities aren't implemented yet but should be over the next few weeks.
------------------------------------------------


Though good info, it doesn't cover the OPs question about why his 
customer is asking for non-RFC1918 space:

"You can use either private IP addresses or public IP addresses 
to configure the peerings. The address range used for configuring 
routes must not overlap with address ranges used to create virtual 
networks in Azure."

They allow 1918 space.

scott








 
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog


_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog