[AusNOG] Airflow for Cisco switches in racks

[Hayden Flack]

Hi Radek,

Have you thought about designing a vent solution that sucks the hot air and
tunnels it to the desired location?

It wouldn't need to be a perfect fit, a vacuum type tubing that could suck
the hot air and release it away from the cold isle containment.

Regards
Hayden

On 6 November 2015 at 12:49, Radek Tkaczyk <radek at tkaczyk.id.au> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> We always mount our network switches in our racks with the switches facing
> the rear, so that when you cable up servers, you don’t have a mess of
> network cabling going from the front of the rack to the back of the rack.
> This has worked well for us for the last 10 years or so, but recently with
> providers like NextDC doing cold isle containment, this means that switches
> are blowing hot air into the cold aisle, and some people get unhappy with
> this.
>
>
>
> We use Cisco 3750 switches which are 1RU, and they blow hot air out the
> back of the switches, some models have side-to-back airflow, but it still
> results in hot air being sent into the cold aisle. I have always thought
> that this amount of hot air was negligible, and wouldn’t even matter in the
> overall scheme of things, as long as your servers were mounted around the
> right way.
>
>
>
> How are other people handling this situation? I’m not really keen on
> changing our rack standards and having to re-do the entire cabling for
> racks across the 4 of our data centres that are using cold isle containment!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Radek Tkaczyk
>
> Ph: 0413 383 231
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151109/9e98f580/attachment.html>