[AusNOG] IPv6

[Russell Langton]

Hi Noel,

Very eye opening from a user point of view.

I know some of those websites have some ipv6 - ipv6.slashdot.org for
example, but from a user point it goes to show that there is alot of work
still to do.

it would be interesting to undertake the same test in the future to see if
any improvements.

I am wondering if the admins of any of those domains are on the list and
could comment on the ipv6 readiness and whats holding it back as a learning
experience?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:

> On 30/03/2015 12:23, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 27/03/2015 21:37, Mark Newton wrote:
>
>
> You're going to make sure that IPv6 cannot possibly be something you can
> use by constructing an impractical test scenario that is guaranteed to
> produce a poor result?
>
> Dual stack, Noel. That means both protocols are running.
>
> You don't need to nuke IPv4, you just need to prevent Happy Eyeballs from
> selecting your IPv4 addresses in preference to your higher-latency tunneled
> IPv6 addresses.
>
> If you had deployed IPv6 on your network, the latencies if the two
> protocols would be equivalent and you'd be sending and receiving about half
> of your household traffic over IPv6 just like the rest of us without
> needing to tweak any Happy Eyeballs settings.
>
> That's up from about 10-15% three years ago. IPv4 is diminishing, and will
> be at background radiation levels by approximately the date at which AusNOG
> participants decide to stop blocking new IPv6 deployment.
>
>    - mark
>
>
>
>
>
> On the contrary Mark, if you and others are saying half my household
> traffic should be over ipv6, than the other half should just not be there...
>
> I have my results, on Saturday I sent David an email checking if it was ok
> to send it to the list, he has not yet replied, but that's OK I decided
> since I am blogging about it anyway, I'll advise the link to the post later
> today, so those who want to see details. It's already written, just need to
> be polished of typos  :) But in case you don't care to read it for details,
> the summary is I found  0.04% of my sites workable on IPv6.
>
> Ohh and Mark Smith's concerns were addressed as well, and only came into
> play on 1 site.
>
>
>
>
>
> The indepth details http://bit.ly/1HWhSDq
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150330/8606a3d6/attachment.html>