[AusNOG] Metadata defined in the bill

[Geordie Guy]

You'll do as you're told as you're or you'll get fined, fired or worse.
Australian network operators had their chance to arc up.

G
On 26/03/2015 8:34 PM, "Ross Wheeler" <ausnog at rossw.net> wrote:

>
>
>  Reading the bill it seems the terminology is a problem.
>>
>> Their use of metadata has nothing to do with what's in the header of an
>> email for example.
>>
>
> (incomprehensible gobbledygook removed)
>
> OK, so the bastards might haul me off... but until I get something from
> the ACMA or the AG department telling me in CLEAR TERMS what I need to do,
> I'm going to do.....   nothing.
>
> They're also going to need to give me a list of people who are permitted
> to request information. I'm not taking the wrap for someone turning up and
> demanding information they have no lawful right to request, or be given.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150326/c0dfb09e/attachment.html>