[AusNOG] Data Retention and CGNAT - educational exercise

[Paul Brooks]

On 26/03/2015 12:16 AM, Scott O'Brien wrote:
[...lots of R&D stuff about new  CG-NAT algorithms...]
>
> I guess the question I’m curious to ask the masses of network geeks is do you see this as a viable way of performing CGNAT on the average consumer base?  Would it work?  I think it’d be useful to be able to more quickly resolve those “who” questions and reduce the amount of data kept in a CGNAT environment.
Ever seen what happens to Google Maps if you limit concurrent source port numbers to
just 100?

Reduce the amount of data to zero - put this energy into deploying IPv6 instead of CG-NAT.
You know you should. You know you can.

P.