[AusNOG] BiLateral Peering Via MegaPort and/or NSW-IX
Laurens Lafebre
laurens at lafebre.me
Fri Mar 6 14:04:38 EST 2015
You do not ask for bi-lateral peers.
Your usage along should dictate who you should be peering with - whether
directly or indirectly.
LL
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:13 AM, <daniel at glovine.com.au> wrote:
> Gday Guys
>
>
>
> For those who may be interested, Our PeeringDB is now fully up to date bar
> our US locations for the moment,
>
>
>
> http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=132839
>
>
>
> Looking forward to peering with you
>
>
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *
> daniel at glovine.com.au
> *Sent:* Friday, 6 March 2015 9:24 AM
> *To:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> *Subject:* [AusNOG] BiLateral Peering Via MegaPort and/or NSW-IX
>
>
>
> Gday Noggers
>
>
>
> Hope you have all had a good week thus far,
>
>
>
> We are looking for Bilateral Peers delivered via MegaPort and / or NSW-IX
>
>
>
> We would highly appreciate anybody whom would be interested in bilateral
> peering with you all via these IX’s on either one or both
>
>
>
> Please respond to this email off-list with your ASN, Peering EndPoint IP
> and Method of delivery (AKA, MegaPort or NSW-IX)
>
>
>
> We look forward to peering with you in a bilateral manner
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150306/8c9af17c/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list