[AusNOG] PIPE-IX - Prefix List Management

Cameron Ferdinands cameron at jferdinands.com
Fri Jun 12 10:10:09 EST 2015


Try Megaport or IX Australia. I don't know if any development has been
put into PIPE IX lately (which is disappointing), but there's been
some good stuff elsewhere[1]. The only information available on PIPE
(if people are tagging their routes in the portal correctly) is a set
of communities to show what state a route originated in[2]

[1]http://www.megaport.com/blog/fine-tuning-route-advertisements
[2]http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2010-February/004681.html

On 12 June 2015 at 07:03, Tom Berryman <Tom at connectivityit.com.au> wrote:
> Heh.
>
> I was afeter “creative ways to manage” – not so much “creative ways to
> manipulate”.
>
> Hoping for a “if you speak to this person, they will set it to use RADB not
> pipeDB” or – “have you seen this tickbox ignores as-path”
>
> Our in-filters are fine. Our cumbersome addition of prefixes to the pipeDB
> is not.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> From: cameron.ferdinands at gmail.com [mailto:cameron.ferdinands at gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Cameron Ferdinands
> Sent: Friday, 12 June 2015 1:24 AM
> To: Tom Berryman
> Cc: <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] PIPE-IX - Prefix List Management
>
>
>
> You might be looking for this.
>
>
>
> http://www.pipenetworks.com/listgenerators.php
>
>
>
> How creative do you want to be? Default out ASXXXX for better Asia
> connectivity? Advertise more specifics to steal transit/intercap? Take
> advantage that the route server may accept /29s? De-aggregate your customers
> prefixes to attract more billable traffic?
>
>
>
> *please don't do any of the above.
>
>
> On Thursday, 11 June 2015, Tom Berryman <Tom at connectivityit.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Wondering if anyone has a “creative” method for managing their PIPE-IX
> prefix lists?
>
> Tom


More information about the AusNOG mailing list