[AusNOG] A thoughtful note
Shane Chrisp
shane at 2000cn.com.au
Wed Jul 15 01:14:06 EST 2015
On 14/07/15 23:09, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
And for those interested in some light reading on defamation when
someone published facts, look up T3 v McNicol case. Yes it cost a lot to
defend, but the truth won out.
> It should be pointed out that this is civil litigation. It costs as
> much (if not more) to pursue it as it does to defend against it. Very
> few lawyers will take a defamation cases on contingency.
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
>
> --
>
> Skeeve Stevens - The ISP Guy - Internet Provider SME
>
> Email: skeeve at theispguy.com <mailto:skeeve at theispguy.com> ; Cell:
> +61(0)414 753 383
>
> Skype: skeeve; Blog: TheISPGuy.com <http://theispguy.com/> ; Facebook:
> TheISPGuy <https://www.facebook.com/theispguy>
>
> Linkedin: /in/skeeve <http://www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve> ; Expert360:
> Profile <https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins369 at gmail.com
> <mailto:paulwilkins369 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >>Do you know that a fact, does not consitute defamation no matter
> how much you may not like it?
>
> Shane,
> Please don't confuse US law with Australian law. Believe all you
> like truth is an absolute defence, but if it gets to court, you'll
> find actual damage to reputation, regardless of truth, will cost an
> arm and a leg. It amuses me that so much of what is general
> perception of the law emanates from US posters.
>
> (I am not a lawyer. This is not expert opinion)
>
> Paul Wilkins
>
>
>
> On 14 July 2015 at 18:14, Shane Chrisp <shane at 2000cn.com.au
> <mailto:shane at 2000cn.com.au>> wrote:
>
> On 14/07/15 16:06, Mark Newton wrote:
>
> I read your post, and all I could come up with was, "Huh"?
> Dont know what you have been reading, but I dont think it was
> the thread I think you are referring to. All I have seen posted
> is information which is based on fact. Do you know that a fact,
> does not consitute defamation no matter how much you may not
> like it?
>
> Anyway, there are list operators who can make these decisions
> without everyone else trying to do their jobs for them every
> time they think someone or something has over stepped, so why
> not let them do it.
>
> Shane
>
>
>
> Making public accusations of criminality is actionable if,
> after due consideration,
> it turns out that your speculation about who this person is,
> what they have been
> accused of doing, and whether the accusations have merit, is
> revealed to be wrong.
>
> It’s also pretty aggressively reckless to use this forum to
> kick over these coals
> without knowing whether the AusNOG Directors’ insurance
> policies cover defamation.
> Shoot your mouth off, and who might lose their house is
> anyone’s guess, eh?
>
> I suspect AusNOG is not the place to make these accusations.
> Perhaps if you want
> to expose mailing list operators like that, do it on a list
> that you, personally,
> operate.
>
> "Stop thread?"
>
> - mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
--
Regards
Shane Chrisp
2000 Computers & Networks Pty Ltd
Suite 6, 49 Hay St, Subiaco, WA 6008
Ph 08 6298 7391 Fx 08 6298 7393
Mb 0412 409 856
Email shane at 2000cn.com.au
Web http://www.2000cn.com.au
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list