[AusNOG] Influencing Routes

[Daniel]

Gday Guys

Thanks for the responses thus far,

So I should keep the BGP to my LAX provider, and also establish another one
back to AU and announce it through my Sydney provider?  So theortically it
will be a shorter path into Sydney > GRE > LAX Router   then over the SCC
and a heap of extra hops

Is that correct?

Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Ben
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2015 5:59 PM
To: Daniel
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Influencing Routes

easist solution is to just run BGP on the GRE tunnel assuming you're
advertising PI space in both locations.  advertise the /24 over the tunnel.

if the /24 is owned by the LA overseas provider you'd have to ask them for
permission to readvertise, and for them to advertise it as a /24.

Ben.

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:16:18PM +1100, Daniel wrote:
>    Hi Guys
> 
>     
> 
>    I have a network related question that I would love some input from you
>    on,
> 
>     
> 
>    Say ive got a network x.x.x.a/24 advertised in LA,  and I have a
GRE/EoIP
>    setup between my network in Sydney and LA,
> 
>     
> 
>    Is there any way I could force traffic for x.x.x.a/24 into my Sydney
>    network and then push it overseas via said tunnel? Instead of the
default
>    route table listing which would take it via (For example) TPG > AAPT >
>    Vocus Sydney > Vocus San Jose > HE > NTT > GloVine > SERVER
> 
>     
> 
>    Any questions please feel free either on or off-list
> 
>     
> 
>    Daniel

> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog