[AusNOG] "ISPs agree to graduated warnings for pirates"

[Nick Gale]

Why don't they force the rights holder to provide a legal and fair
alternative in the notice to the specific content that was pirated rather
than some generic directions to places where legal content can be had.

Seconding that section if the rights holder is unable to provide direction
to said legal copy available to Australian users of alleged infringement
then the notice must be dropped.

This puts onus on rights holders to make sure that their content is
available in country as well.

------------------------------------------------
*Nick Gale*

P Please consider the environment before you print this email.

On 22 February 2015 at 13:07, David Beveridge <dave at bevhost.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> The fact it specifically excludes wireless forms also places it into the
>> joke box.
>>
> It seems that customers behind CGN's are also excluded, because they
> cannot be identified by the IP address.
> Unless the rights holder is also able to provide the port number and such
> data is actually held by the ISP.
>
> Maybe this goes hand in hand with metadata retention after all.
>
> dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150222/c161898f/attachment.html>