[AusNOG] Hijacked Prefix

[Joseph Goldman]

Surely advertising a range you don't own in a bill dispute is not the 
right way to do this - wouldn't this be similar to advertising a Bogon?

Daniel:

What was TPG's response? Did you supply a letter on official letterhead 
revoking the initial LoA?
What response does Metwide give when you contact their main support number?

On 13/02/15 12:38, Nathan Brookfield wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> There may be a handful of reasons that this is occurring, such as your 
> client owing the old provider money etc which is likely the case.  
> This is a legal issue between the IP Address owner and TCR Holdings, 
> you should leave it up to them.
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Nathan Brookfield (VK2NAB)
>
> *From:*AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of 
> *daniel at glovine.com.au
> *Sent:* Friday, 13 February 2015 12:34 PM
> *To:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
> *Subject:* [AusNOG] Hijacked Prefix
>
> Hi Guys
>
> I need a bit of assistance here,
>
> One of our customers has a prefix 203.55.215.0/24 which is a /24 of 
> 203.55.214.0/23,
>
> TCR Holdings / Metwide are advertising this prefix without permission 
> and thus far all attempts to contact them and have this removed are 
> ending at failure,
>
> The owner of these prefixes has even been to the extent of contacting 
> their upstream provider TPG without success
>
> I was wondering if anybody else has ever had any issues like this, and 
> might be able to point me in the right direction for the next step,
>
> The customer has already updated this /24 prefix description stating 
> that its been hijacked so it appears all over the address space
>
> Appreciate any help on or off-list
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150213/fff3a2f7/attachment.html>