[AusNOG] Multi-Tenant VoIP PBX

[Davey Goode]

Hi Shane,

We have a number of clients running 3CX for their clients as a hosted option and seem to be very happy with it, altho I am seeing a number of good things being said about the 2600Hz platform if you want to go all out.

HTH’s



Davey Goode / Chief Technical Officer
+64 21 772 937 / davey at vibecommunications.co.nz<mailto:davey at vibecommunications.co.nz>
[Vibe Communications]<applewebdata://1D364E3F-B18C-4C57-A6EB-5E84AD888394/www.vibecommunications.co.nz> [Vibe Communications] <https://www.facebook.com/VibeCom>  [Vibe Communications] <https://twitter.com/vibecomnz>  [Vibe Communications] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/1941512>
Office: +64 9 222 0000 / Fax: 0800 842 326
L2 155 K’ Road, Auckland, New Zealand
Web: www.vibecommunications.co.nz<http://www.vibecommunications.co.nz/> / Peering: AS45177<http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=45177>
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.



From: AusNOG <ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>> on behalf of Shane C <shanec-au at outlook.com<mailto:shanec-au at outlook.com>>
Date: Saturday, 12 December 2015 at 2:26 AM
To: "ausnog at ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog at ausnog.net>" <ausnog at ausnog.net<mailto:ausnog at ausnog.net>>
Subject: [AusNOG] Multi-Tenant VoIP PBX

Hi All

Necessity seems to be demanding we provide a few basic hosted VoIP PBX for clients who aren’t happy with what the providers out there are offering (either price, service, support or features).

FreePBX seems to be the go as far as a powerful platform is concerned. We can easily spin up an instance of this for each client and off we go. However, I’m looking at how we can conserve resources (CPU, RAM and in particular IP space in the DC). There are a few “multi-tenant” products out there but from my reading, none of them seem to be great.

Just wondering if anyone out there has looked at this problem and solved it? Did you use a product, or use a different approach? If you’ve used one of the muti-tenant products, which ones did you evaluate and how did they go? Any gotchas that aren’t obvious? I’d rather not find them six months after we move clients across… :P

Shane
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151211/6fd96cdd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 03E2A0AB-1147-4AB6-9D78-0B7B72B2F3EB[23].png
Type: image/png
Size: 3549 bytes
Desc: 03E2A0AB-1147-4AB6-9D78-0B7B72B2F3EB[23].png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151211/6fd96cdd/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: A4F7EF78-4427-4956-BA02-30FCC0AD7F94[23].png
Type: image/png
Size: 905 bytes
Desc: A4F7EF78-4427-4956-BA02-30FCC0AD7F94[23].png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151211/6fd96cdd/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EC4AAA28-ECD3-4401-9688-1FBF6D29A533[23].png
Type: image/png
Size: 1064 bytes
Desc: EC4AAA28-ECD3-4401-9688-1FBF6D29A533[23].png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151211/6fd96cdd/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1F597265-452D-4F3A-BD48-C058B17809E3[23].png
Type: image/png
Size: 803 bytes
Desc: 1F597265-452D-4F3A-BD48-C058B17809E3[23].png
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20151211/6fd96cdd/attachment-0003.png>