[AusNOG] Virtual routers that users can manage without interfering with other tenants

[Mark Smith]

So I don't know the pricing or specs of any of the routers mentioned, but
isn't one of the theoretical benefits of virtualization that you can run as
many instances as you like, which also means you can also "right-size"?

In other words, don't try to share a single virtual router between many
people, give them each their own.
On 26 Aug 2015 23:54, "Chris Bennett" <chris at ceegeebee.com> wrote:

> > I would like to try and do it in a scalable way, as we are thinking
> > we may have to allocate each customer a VLAN instead of using a
> > common VLAN, but just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts on
> > other ways to do this?
>
> Assuming you have it or can afford it, you can do private vlans with
> the Nexus 1000V (on KVM or VMware), or VMware's vNetwork Distributed
> Switch (VDS).
>
> Otherwise you could implement ACL's on virtual firewall products that
> sit between the vNIC and vSwitch (there are a few to choose from).
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150827/76900079/attachment.html>