[AusNOG] Attempting to understand DC internet connectivity

[Mark Newton]

> On 14 Apr 2015, at 2:07 pm, Richard Thornton <richie.thornton at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Mark, I remember seeing that in the past and thinking it was dodgy that they were modifying/ignoring my prepends, looking at the best way to add resiliency at minimum cost.

It’s not dodgy, it’s in their own best interests to send traffic to you over links you pay them for, rather than over peering links that they have to pay someone else for.

A lot of (most? all?) transit providers do it, it’s no big deal.

  - mark


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150414/9ad39891/attachment.sig>