[AusNOG] Public Internet Access Policies

[Narelle]

Mate. The 'evil bit' filter there doesn't filter out the 'dirty bits'.
I am proposing a new RFC for that.


N

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Geordie Guy <elomis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Put an inline appliance in to filter based off the evil bit.  RFC 3514
> details how to go about it.
>
> G
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Narelle <narellec at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What is really important is that you are open and very clear about
>> what you offer under what terms.
>>
>> Preferably without the usual endless, meaningless minutiae supposedly
>> representing terms and conditions. Make it consumer friendly!
>>
>> From my understanding (and IANAL) both 1. there is potential liability
>> for a range of Internet sourced problems, but 2. the minute you start
>> claiming that there is limited risk (through filtering, virus
>> protection etc, you start taking on the risk...
>>
>> Many providers simply declare that they aren't taking on the risk, and
>> that people use the services at their own risk.
>>
>> How often do people actually look at pron in public places?
>>
>> How often do they propagate viruses? Or fall for online scams?
>>
>> Priorities people.
>>
>>
>> Narelle
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>



-- 


Narelle
narellec at gmail.com