[AusNOG] FW: [Ap-ipv6tf] official shutdown date for IPv4. The date he is pushing for is April 4, 2024. "IPv4 can't go on forever, " Latour said. "
Mark ZZZ Smith
markzzzsmith at yahoo.com.au
Fri Nov 7 19:20:20 EST 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>
> To: James Andrewartha <trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
> Cc: "'ausnog at lists.ausnog.net'" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>; Nathanael Bettridge <nathanael at prodigy.com.au>
> Sent: Thursday, 6 November 2014, 15:51
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] FW: [Ap-ipv6tf] official shutdown date for IPv4. The date he is pushing for is April 4, 2024. "IPv4 can't go on forever, " Latour said. "
>
>
> In message <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411061223310.9772 at motsugo.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>,
> Jame
> s Andrewartha writes:
>> On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> > Multiple PA prefixes work today with a single border router as it
>> > can manage the RA as seen by all the clients. ULA + PA works today
>> > which gives you stability across PA renumber events, PD lifetime
>> > expiry etc.
>> >
>> > Homenet is in the process of specifying multiple PA's from
> multiple
>> > routers + ULA all automagically managed. This is adding source +
>> > destination address routing to the home CPE device. Prefix delegation
>> > within the home from multiple providers. Topology discovery etc.
>> >
>> > ISP1 <-> CM <-> IR <-> IR <-> phone
> <-> ISP2
>> > \ /
>> > IR
>> > / \
>> > CM cable modem
>> > IR interior router
>> >
>> > Where you have PA addresses delegated using PD from both ISP1 and
> ISP2.
>>
>> This is all fantastic. But, "in the process of specifying." So
> we'll see
>> it in CPE in 5 years? I might even have NBN by that point. As a side note,
>> how does MPTCP (RFC 6824) work in this sort of environment? Now that's
> a
>> client-side solution to multiple uplinks.
>
> Given there is running code being done along side the spec being
> tested in Linux based routers I would expect much sooner.
>
One of the IETF homenet participants is also one of the main OpenWRT IPv6 maintainers, and I'm pretty sure the latest 14.07 release of OpenWRT already supports SA + DA routing for multihoming. If you look at the IPv6 route table using the 'ip' tool, you'll see 'from' field prefix values, which is the source address prefix match.
>> --
>> # TRS-80 trs80(a)ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au #/ "Otherwise Bub here
> will d
>> o \
>> # UCC Wheel Member http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/ #| what squirrels do best
>> |
>> [ "There's nobody getting rich writing ]| -- Collect and
> hide your
>> |
>> [ software that I know of" -- Bill Gates, 1980 ]\ nuts." --
> Acid Reflux #23
>> 1 /
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list