[AusNOG] PIPE DC's to allow Megaport!

[Robert Hudson]

PacNet do run DCs for customers, I have kit in their Sydney DC (133
Liverpool St).  I don't believe PacNet were blocking anything though - I've
been told that MP is coming to PacNet's Sydney DC for a few months now (by
both PacNet and MP staff).


On 23 May 2014 10:09, Joshua D'Alton <joshua at railgun.com.au> wrote:

> Congrats on the long slog Bevan and MP!
>
> With this victory now, will it enable MP to enter even Telstra/Pacnet etc
> DCs now? Or is that.. not the same? I guess since PIPE/TPG operate DCs for
> customers, whereas Telstra/pacnet is purely internal/end user use?
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au>wrote:
>
>> Thanks John.  I'd like to also thank the patient Megaport customers in
>> PIPE (and a few other telco facilities) who continue to support our
>> attempts to innovate.  I'd also like to thank the TIO.
>>
>> Will post the full TIO determination once legal has given its blessing.
>>  It makes great reading.
>>
>> [b]
>>
>> From: John Lindsay <johnslindsay at mac.com>
>> Date: Friday, 23 May 2014 9:46 AM
>> To: Curtis Bayne <curtis at bayne.com.au>
>> Cc: "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] PIPE DC's to allow Megaport!
>>
>> And I just sent Bevan a note thanking him for once again doing the heavy
>> lifting for the industry.
>>
>> John Lindsay
>>
>> On 22 May 2014, at 4:45 pm, Curtis Bayne <curtis at bayne.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> Beat me to it John. Low impact facilities just became a lot less hassle
>> now someone else has spent the money establishing the precedent you can
>> point to next time building management kicks up a fuss.
>>
>> Thanks Megaport!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John Lindsay <johnslindsay at mac.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Oooh yeeah, it's good.
>>>
>>> This also means it will require legislative change to prevent a
>>> competitive FTTB operator from entering an apartment basement.
>>>
>>> John Lindsay
>>>
>>> On 22 May 2014, at 4:38 pm, Curtis Bayne <curtis at bayne.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Significantly, it confirmed that PIPE’s telehousing customers are
>>> regarded as “occupiers” of the building, and that Megaport can exercise its
>>> legal rights to install "in-building subscriber connection equipment” to
>>> supply them with competing services."
>>>
>>> This is good. Very good.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jared Hirst <
>>> jared.hirst at serversaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For those that have been waiting to get Megaport in PIPE’s DC’s, it may
>>>> now be possible (finally)!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.megaport.com/blog/entry/megaport-wins-against-pipe-networks-at-the-tio.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jared
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140523/c92e4d51/attachment.html>