[AusNOG] So are iiNet condoning illegal piracy?

[Paul Brooks]

On 11/06/2014 1:09 PM, Damian Guppy wrote:
> Isnt that in the safe harbor provisions of the telco act?

What 'Safe Harbour' provisions in the Telco Act? Safe Harbour (and 'Common Carrier')
are concepts in US legislation, not Australian legislation.

IANAL - but you should consult a real one if you think there is some sort of blanket
'CSP not responsible for actions of customers' in Australian legislation, so you can
keep the reference handy.

P.

>
> --Damian
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Paul Brooks <pbrooks-ausnog at layer10.com.au
> <mailto:pbrooks-ausnog at layer10.com.au>> wrote:
>
>     On 11/06/2014 11:43 AM, Mike Ryan - Brass Razoo Group wrote:
>     >
>     > By opposing legislation that outlaws criminal activity (intellectual property
>     theft)
>     > are iiNet giving a tacit nod to illegal activities? ISP's and carriers are not
>     > liable for the behaviour of their clients. iiNet should stick to providing
>     > shareholder value and ensuring system availability.
>     > It's called "Rule of Law".
>     Please indicate where in Australian law this 'ISP's and carriers are not liable for
>     the behaviour of their clients' is described.
>     Particularly regarding ISPs.
>
>     P.
>     _______________________________________________
>     AusNOG mailing list
>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140612/a50e9b30/attachment.html>