[AusNOG] another ipv6 Q

[Robert Hudson]

Sorry, I meant IPv4 /22 (at which point I believe I'd be correct, but am
happy to be corrected).

That's a terrible mechanical memory of mine, typing /24 all the time!


On 3 July 2014 12:28, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com>
wrote:

> This would be incorrect Robert.
>
> A /24 is 1180
> A /48 is 1180
> A /32 is 1994
>
> So, you would pay 1994 if you had a /24 and /32
>
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
>
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Robert Hudson <hudrob at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3 July 2014 11:48, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In message <CAEUfUGPOheJKFW8yNUJ_Y=
>>> wtOV978RaeXraMfLP82xQJXrB+0A at mail.gmail.com>, Skee
>>> ve Stevens writes:
>>> > --e89a8f8393fdab65e704fd3faae4
>>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>> >
>>> > Mark,
>>> >
>>> > To be accurate, ipv6 from APNIC is not $0.
>>>
>>> I said he could get IPv6 addresses for $0 based on the prerequiste
>>> that he had IPv4 addresses from them.  I did not say how many
>>> addresses he could get for $0 or that he could get unlimited IPv6
>>> addresses because I couldn't be bothered running the calculator.
>>>
>>> > If your IPv6 allocation exceeds the value of the IPv4 allocation, you
>>> will
>>> > pay the greater of the two.
>>>
>>> Which is why the next sentence was "You pay MAX(IPv4 cost, IPv6 cost)."
>>
>>
>>  If you have a /24 IPv4 allocation from APNIC, it is my understanding
>> that you can get a /32 IPv6 allocation at no additional cost (and I believe
>> it has infact already been allocated to you by default, you just need to
>> claim it and start using it).
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140703/22e75344/attachment.html>