[AusNOG] another ipv6 Q
Mitchell Warden
wardenm at wardenm.net
Thu Jul 3 11:00:59 EST 2014
The RFC prohibits this. If you already have a /24, I don't think it will cost you any more in APNIC fees to add a /48.
6to4 prefixes more specific than 2002::/16 must not be propagated in native IPv6 routing, to prevent pollution of the IPv6 routing table by elements of the IPv4 routing table. Therefore, a 6to4 site which also has a native IPv6 connection MUST NOT advertise its 2002::/48 routing prefix on that connection, and all native IPv6 network operators MUST filter out and discard any 2002:: routing prefix advertisements longer than /16.Cheers.
Mitchell
_____
From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com]
To: Skeeve Stevens [mailto:skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com]
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:ausnog at lists.ausnog.net]
Sent: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 10:40:51 +1000
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] another ipv6 Q
Why, I didn’t say I wanted to use the ipv6 to ipv4 mechanism, I just want to use a /48 ipv6 range that nobody else can lay claim to.. well for as long as I have the ipv4 /24
This was more of a thought problem than anything else.
A
From: Skeeve Stevens [mailto:skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2014 10:36 AM
To: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] another ipv6 Q
This is a strange question.
One thing that some engineers don't seem to understand is that IPv4 and IPv6 have absolutely nothing to do with each other. At no point do they communicate with each other unless some translation method is used... but that method is doing the interpretation.
Even dual-stacking v4 and v6 on the same interface doesn't make them interact in any way whatsoever.
...Skeeve
Skeeve Stevens - eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker <Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com> wrote:
Hi
So we have a ipv4 class C assigned to us. What if any pitfalls are there for using the ipv4 in ipv6 address space ?
Alex
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140703/a995f658/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list