[AusNOG] Megaport Suspends Accepting New Orders in PIPE DC's

[Andrew Jones]

On 14.01.2014 17:03, Matt Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:34:22AM +0800, Damian Guppy wrote:
>> I would think it is a lot more clear if a renter / owner of an 
>> apartment or
>> leaser of office space is an occupier than if a colo customer is an
>> occupier, for one apartment renters / office leasers are covered 
>> under
>> tennency laws which would provide the legal 'precedent' however colo
>> customers are not covered by these laws (IANAL)
>
> Oooh, next legal battle: get colo customers covered by commercial 
> tenancy
> agreements...

PIPE's colo service schedule (at least the one I've seen) has a clause 
specifically stating that the contract does not create a tenancy between 
PIPE and the customer and does not give the customer occupation rights, 
license, easement etc.