[AusNOG] WAN security

[Tim March]

Not sure how quick they'll run, but .gov and .gov.au both use TACLANE
devices: http://www.gdc4s.com

... Apparently they were originally developed for the NSA. What could
possibly go wrong.



T.

On 8/01/14 9:32 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Nope unfortunately not cisco.
> 
> Alex
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom.Minchin at csiro.au [mailto:Tom.Minchin at csiro.au]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014 8:26 AM
>> To: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
>> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] WAN security
>>
>> If it is Cisco equipment, we have started doing Macsec encryption over 10G
>> WAN links.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:Alex.Samad at yieldbroker.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 08:21 AM
>> To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
>> Subject: [AusNOG] WAN security
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Curious to know what people are doing to security wan traffic.
>>
>> So I have
>>
>> 10G switch  -> 10G SFP+ -> fibre -> 10G SFP+ -> 10G Switch
>>
>> I am running vlans across there, I am wondering if there is a piece of
>> hardware I can buy that encrypt all the traffic and that I can easily fit in the
>> path and doesn't add a lot of latency.
>>
>> Alex
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> 

-- 
PGP/GNUPG Public Key: http://d3vnu11.com/pub.key